UDS service and session testing
Build focused tests around diagnostic sessions, DIDs, routine control, security access, positive responses, and negative responses.
Vehicle Diagnostics · UDS Testing
I test and troubleshoot UDS communication across diagnostic sessions, DIDs, routine control, security access, DTC handling, ISO-TP, DoIP, CAN, and CAN-FD. The work can extend an existing CANoe project or start from your ECU behavior and problem description.
Discuss a UDS ProjectProblems I can investigate
Investigate whether missing diagnostic responses relate to transport, network communication, diagnostic session state, or the ECU interaction sequence.
Reproduce incomplete diagnostic requests and compare observed responses with the expected UDS flow, timing, and available diagnostic data.
Capture and analyze negative-response codes in context to identify where the request sequence, session state, or service expectations diverge.
Trace recurring DTC behavior across clearing, subsequent requests, and related diagnostic activity without assuming the cause from the code alone.
What I can help with
Build focused tests around diagnostic sessions, DIDs, routine control, security access, positive responses, and negative responses.
Check UDS exchanges over ISO-TP on CAN or CAN-FD, or over DoIP on an IP network as supported by the setup. Keep transport failures separate from UDS service-response failures.
Create repeatable CANoe workflows and CAPL scripts for request sequences, response checks, setup, and recorded test results.
Use observed ECU communication, DTC behavior, DID access, and supplied diagnostic descriptions to narrow down inconsistent results.
What to send
The ECU available for communication or testing, together with the diagnostic behavior that needs to be exercised.
The available diagnostic-data description for interpreting services, DIDs, and expected diagnostic content.
The packaged exchange containing the ODX diagnostic data used for the testing scope.
A timestamped bus communication recording for reviewing observed requests, responses, and transport behavior.
The current CANoe configuration and project assets when the work extends an established test environment.
Observed symptoms, reproduction steps, context, and the expected behavior to compare against test results.
How the analysis works
Review the ECU, available ODX or PDX data, recordings, project assets, and problem description to establish the requests and responses that need testing.
Run the relevant diagnostic flow and capture the ECU communication, diagnostic session context, transport activity, and returned responses.
Examine CAN, CAN-FD, ISO-TP, or DoIP activity alongside UDS request sequencing to narrow where the behavior differs from expectations.
Create focused CANoe and CAPL automation where useful, with setup, assertions, and result handling aligned to the agreed test scope.
Summarize reproduced behavior, relevant traces, test results, and remaining uncertainty in an engineering analysis.
What you receive
Executable tests with setup, assertions, repeatable diagnostic flows, and result handling for the agreed ECU behavior.
Software for executing and interpreting the in-scope ECU diagnostic services.
CAPL source implementing the agreed CANoe behavior, diagnostic sequence, or automated checks.
A documented technical analysis containing evidence, reproduced behavior, findings, and unresolved points where applicable.
Technologies & formats
ISO 14229 diagnostic services for communicating with vehicle ECUs.
A development, simulation, test, and analysis environment for vehicle networks.
Vector event-driven language for network simulation, testing, and automation.
A segmented transport protocol for messages carried over CAN.
Diagnostic transport over IP networks as defined by ISO 13400.
A coded diagnostic record identifying a detected fault condition.
A UDS identifier addressing diagnostic data exposed by an ECU.
An ECU diagnostic operating mode controlling service availability and timing.
The UDS service used to start, stop, or request results from ECU routines.
A diagnostic challenge-response mechanism that unlocks protected ECU services.
The Classic AUTOSAR basic-software module handling diagnostic communication.
A priority-based broadcast bus used for in-vehicle control communication.
An extension of CAN with larger payloads and a faster data phase.
FAQ
Discuss the evidence
Share the ECU context, diagnostic data, recording, or problem description. I can review the scope and suggest a focused UDS testing engagement.